Business system simulator

ABSTRACT

Users of a simulator gain skills for investing using a simulator. The simulator simulates a business system that conducts a market transaction. The simulator selects a set of factors from a plurality of sets; selects a current factor from the selected set; and determines a price in accordance with the current factor. The simulator further updates a financial position of the user of the simulator in response to a transaction; and performs the transaction in accordance with the price and an input from the user. The input from the user corresponds in content to an input to the business system. Consequently, the user develops skill in specifying market transactions to be conducted by reviewing changes in the user&#39;s financial position. The simulator may include a simulated competitor having a financial position affected by transactions according to a strategy of the competitor selected from a set of stored strategies.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S.patent application Ser. No. 10/830,836, filed Apr. 22, 2004 in the nameof Otmar Schlunk and entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVINGINVESTING,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention relate to simulation of businesssystems that conduct market transactions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Business systems that conduct market transactions are well known. Suchsystems include for example manual and automated organizations andrecording offices for determining and changing the ownership of businessentities, real estate, and commercial paper. Traditionally, thesesystems are based entirely on records formed on papers (e.g., formationof entities, agreements, purchases and sales); and based onorganizations that handle such papers (e.g., negotiators, persons whosign papers, and recording offices that make official copies of papersavailable to others). Access to these systems is generally limited toregistered brokers and accredited investors.

Some markets today are accessible via business systems that are fullyautomated (e.g., based on electronic data processing, electronicsignatures, and electronic funds transfer). For instance, systems forchanging the ownership of stock in a corporate business entityelectronically maintain records of title and value of ownershippositions, and perform electronic transactions that change theseownership positions. Recently, individuals having no prerequisitefinancial education have access to business systems that perform markettransactions and may use such systems for investing on their ownaccount. By operating such business systems, the operator (e.g., aprivate investor) may research entities, obtain quoted values of stockin entities, and specify trades to acquire or change holdings inentities. For example, the Internet provides many web sites (e.g.,www.etrade.com) presenting user interfaces for business systemsincluding business systems that conduct stock market transactions.

Improper operation of business systems that conduct market transactionsfor an investor place the investor at greater risk of loss or incuractual loss to the financial position of the investor. Participation byunskilled investors in some markets may make those markets more volatilefor all participants. Governments may view volatility in markets as aproblem to be controlled and further upset free market dynamics.

Operators of complex military systems are conventionally trained usingsimulators. Generally, a simulator forces a trainee to make decisions ina manner that develops skills that are transferable to operating thecomplex systems. For instance a military aircraft is a complexelectronic and mechanical system that requires skill to pilot.Simulators for military aircraft are well known for training pilots.Pilots who have operated simulators have demonstrated that skillsacquired via simulation are transferable to skilled operation of themilitary aircraft. Skills relate to tactics (e.g., how to fly the planeand how to accurately apply deadly force) and strategy (e.g., how toaccomplish a mission by managing risk during a flight).

Simulators for operating business systems that conduct markettransactions are not widely available and so are not widely used. Asuitable simulator should present a relatively simple user interfacethat focuses attention on those aspects of the simulation that aredesirable for quickly acquiring transferable skills. The simulatorshould also be responsive so that skills are developed in a minimum oftime. Because a simulator is a limited resource, making use of thesimulator efficient should consequently increase the capacity of thesimulator for use by many trainees in serial or in parallel or both. Inother words, as the efficiency of the simulator increases, more traineesshould have access to the limited resource of the simulator. The cost ofproviding a simulator should also decrease per trainee as the efficiencyand/or scale of the simulator is increased.

Conventional simulators of business systems that conduct markettransactions are complex and relatively unresponsive. Thesecharacteristics deter trainees from reaching goals of desired increasedskills, cause training to take too long to acquire skills, discourageoperators from persisting with the simulator based training, and makeoperation of the simulator inaccessible to a large number of unskilledpersons desiring to become skilled operators for improved investing.

There are numerous social consequences of failing to employ skilledoperators of business systems that conduct market transactions. Withoutskilled investors investment capital that could be available isunavailable. Consequently new products do not come to market, new groupscannot form for launching new ventures, forming new entities, andbringing new business models to investors and to the market. New sourcesof tax revenue are unavailable so that existing national defense,education, health, and welfare programs are relatively under fundedand/or new programs for these societal goals cannot be launched.

Business systems for conducting market transactions that allocateresources to unskilled users may operate less efficiently for all usersdue to practical limits on resource availability. Resources includebandwidth for communication, processing time, and data storage. Use ofsuch systems by unskilled users necessarily consumes resources thatcould have been more efficiently used by skilled users. The cost of useby all users must be borne by skilled and unskilled users. Use byunskilled users may increase the costs for skilled users to use such asystem. These systems may provide an unskilled user an environment forlearning by trial and error; however, such a learning environment is notefficient for quick mastery of skills. This failure is due in part tothe specialization of such conventional business systems (e.g., limitedto executing stock transactions without knowledge of a completefinancial position of the user).

Without systems and methods for training in the operation of businesssystems that conduct market transactions, many persons desiring tobecome skilled investors cannot reach this goal and are therebyfinancially handicapped. Further, investors without suitable skills mayfail to employ reliable tactical and strategic operations when operatingbusiness systems that conduct market transactions with negativeconsequences personally and for society as discussed above.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A simulator, according to various aspects of the present invention,simulates a business system that conducts a market transaction. Thesimulator includes one or more engines that determine a price for anopportunity to participate in the market. Determining the price mayinclude selecting a set of factors from a plurality of sets; selecting acurrent factor from the selected set; and determining a price inaccordance with the current factor. The one or more engines may furtherupdate a financial position of the user of the simulator in response toa transaction; and perform the transaction in accordance with the priceand an input from the user. The input from the user corresponds incontent to an input to the business system whereby the user developsskill in specifying market transactions to be conducted by reviewingchanges in the user's financial position.

A method, according to various aspects of the present invention, isperformed by a computer system having a user. The method simulates abusiness system that conducts a market transaction. The method includesdetermining a price for an opportunity to participate in the market.Determining the price may include selecting a set of factors from aplurality of sets; selecting a current factor from the selected set; anddetermining a price in accordance with the current factor. The methodmay further include updating a financial position of the user inresponse to a transaction; and performing the transaction in accordancewith the price and an input from the user, the input from the usercorresponding in content to an input to the business system whereby theuser develops skill in specifying market transactions to be conducted byreviewing changes in the user's financial position. A memory device,according to various aspects of the present invention, includesinstructions for a computer system to perform this method.

A simulator, according to various aspects of the present invention,simulates a business system that conducts a market transaction. Thesimulator includes one or more engines that updates a first financialposition of a simulated competitor that uses the business system for afirst transaction; updates a second financial position of the user inresponse to a second transaction; and performs the second transaction inaccordance with an input from the user. The input from the usercorresponding in content to an input to the business system whereby theuser develops skill in specifying market transactions to be conducted byreviewing changes in the user's financial position and by being aware ofthe first transaction and the simulated competitor's financial position.The simulated competitor may determine whether to participate in thefirst transaction in accordance with a strategy selected from a set ofstored strategies.

A method, according to various aspects of the present invention, forsimulating a business system that conducts a market transaction includesupdating a first financial position of a simulated competitor that usesthe business system for a first transaction; updating a second financialposition of the user in response to a second transaction; and performingthe second transaction in accordance with an input from the user. Theinput from the user corresponding in content to an input to the businesssystem whereby the user develops skill in specifying market transactionsto be conducted by reviewing changes in the user's financial positionand by being aware of the first transaction and changes in the simulatedcompetitor's financial position. The simulated competitor may determinewhether to participate in the first transaction in accordance with astrategy selected from a set of stored strategies. A memory device,according to various aspects of the present invention, includesinstructions for performing this method.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

Embodiments of the present invention will now be further described withreference to the drawing, wherein like designations denote likeelements, and:

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of business systems to be simulatedby systems and methods of the present invention;

FIG. 2A is a functional block diagram of system according to variousaspects of the present invention; and

FIG. 2B is a functional block diagram of an engine for use in the systemof FIG. 2A;

FIG. 3 is a data flow diagram of a user process according to variousaspects of the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a data flow diagram of a competitor process according tovarious aspects of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Business systems that perform market transactions seem to be deceptivelysimple to operate. Use of such a system may appear to hinge on one useraction (e.g., a click through) authorizing a transaction. A userconventionally selects a system suitable for a desired market, specifiesa financial account to use for the transaction (e.g., principal, costs,proceeds), specifies the transaction to be performed (e.g., number ofshares or options, price or price limits, trade date and time, type oftransaction (e.g., buy, sell, put, call), and indicates his or herauthorization (e.g., buy/sell order) to complete the transaction. Anyconventional business system (e.g., a web site, a trading terminal) forany conventional market may be used (e.g., stocks, bonds, othercommercial paper, futures, real estate, trusts, partnerships,intellectual properties). Unskilled users of such systems may lackskills in determining any of the foregoing specifications and theauthorization. Negative consequences may result as discussed above.

For example, a conventional network of business systems 10 of FIG. 1includes system 12 for tracking personal finances, system 14 formanaging accounts, system 16 for trading stock and commercial paper,system 18 for managing businesses and business interests, and system 20for trading real property. System 10 is a typical personal computer usedby an individual to keep a home budget. System 10 accesses accountinformation at one or more banks and credit card processors (e.g., websites) to track automatic deposits of the user's salary and expenses(e.g. checks that have cleared, credit card charges and payments). Theuser may also use system 16 (e.g., another web site) to buy and sellstocks on his account. Each transaction is authorized by operation bythe user of a control of a user interface (e.g., a button 17 operated bymouse click for confirming a transaction). The user may further usesystem 18 for buying and selling real estate or real estate trustpositions; confirmation of transactions being by control 19 analogous tocontrol 17 discussed above. Still further, the user may use system 20for buying and selling (or managing) businesses; confirmation oftransactions being by control 21 analogous to control 17 discussedabove. Each system 16, 18, and 20 receives investments from the userfrom system 14 by electronic funds withdrawal and provides passiveincome to the user as electronic funds transfer deposits to system 14.An unskilled user may operate controls 16, 18, and/or 20 in a mannerthat causes the problems discussed above.

A system according to various aspects of the present invention teaches auser skills that are transferable to improved operation of businesssystems (e.g., 16, 18, and 20) discussed above. Improved operationgenerally includes improved investing for the user's account(s) (e.g.,14). The improvement may be in reducing financial risk that the usercould otherwise be exposed to; and/or obtaining an improved financialposition as understood by the application of generally acceptedaccounting practices (GAAP). Teaching is accomplished in part bypresenting to the user various opportunities that the user is asked todecide to authorize or to pass. The opportunities are based on simulatedmarket conditions. According to various aspects of the presentinvention, the user may learn tactics (e.g., how to evaluate aparticular opportunity) and may learn strategies (e.g., acquiringassets, then using assets to increase cash flow).

A system according to various aspects of the present invention may beimplemented as a stand alone station (e.g., for use by one or more usersin turn); or as a network of clients and/or servers. Conventionalclient/server and client/client technologies may be used. Stand aloneimplementations include general purpose computers (e.g., lap top, desktop, palm top, cell phone) having user interfaces and include general orspecial purpose gaming devices having interfaces to use a conventionaltelevision set as a display and any conventional gaming user interfaceunit (e.g., hand held joy stick and gaming push button switches).

For example, system 100 of FIGS. 2A, 2B, 3, and 4 includes server 102,network 104, client 106, and station 108. Server 102 represents anynumber of computer systems having conventional software for coupling toa network (e.g., the Internet) via a conventional link 103 and softwarefor teaching as discussed herein. Client 106 represents any number ofcomputer systems having conventional software (e.g., a browser) forcommunicating with one or more servers via a conventional link 105. Inone implementation servers are omitted and clients communicate with eachother using conventional technology and software installed on one orboth clients for teaching as discussed herein. Links 103 and 105 supportsignals for transferring (e.g., downloading) software and for conveyingmessages between processes to accomplish methods discussed herein. Inanother implementation, client 106 includes a conventional browser(e.g., Internet Explorer marketed by Microsoft) and server 102 includesall training software (e.g., except for conventional cookies and appletsas may be used by the browser).

Station 108 represents any number of computer systems, each operatingindependently of all other entities shown in FIG. 2A. A station 108 maycommunicate with other servers, clients, or stations via network 104temporarily via link 107 as desired (e.g., product registration,download of software and updates, sharing of usage reports, or trainingprogress reports). A stand alone station 108 in one implementationincludes processes of server 102 adapted using conventional techniquesto operate without a network and with the user interface of station 108(e.g., computer monitor, LCD cell phone display, television set). andprocesses of client 106

Processes performed by computer systems (e.g., servers, clients, andstand alone stations) of FIG. 2A may be performed by one or moreengines. An engine includes any circuit, firmware, and software forperforming stored program instructions. The logic of the process may beperformed to any extent by circuitry and/or program instructions. Forexample, engine 200 or FIG. 2B includes a processor 202, bus 204, systemmemory 206, and application memory 208. Engine 200 may includeinterfaces (not shown) to conventional peripherals such as displays andkeyboards. A server 102 includes any number of engines 200 and may omitperipherals (except possibly for administrative control of a server). Aclient 106 or a station 108 may include any number of engines 200 andinterfaces for user interaction with teaching software discussed herein.Memory (206, 208) may include any combination of conventional memorydevices (e.g., disks, CDROMs, semiconductor RAM, EPROM) and may bedivided as shown to simplify use of the engine for application programsdifferent from training software described herein. For example,application memory may be packaged as a game module to be inserted intoa station (e.g., a Microsoft X-Box). In one implementation, a gamemodule includes an engine 200 programmed to perform teaching software asdiscussed herein. In another implementation, engine 200 is formed on asemiconductor substrate.

Methods according to various aspects of the present invention teach auser skills for improved investing as discussed above. These methods maybe implemented with any number of user processes and competitorprocesses and at a minimum include one user process and no competitorprocesses. System 100 conducts any number of sessions simultaneously,each session comprising a context for competition among users (if morethan one) and competitor processes (if any). In an implementationdiscussed below, system 100 provides in each session a simulator of abusiness system as discussed above; and, among other functions, presentsopportunities for transactions on a simulated market served by thatbusiness system. A user process presents hypothetical opportunities,reports, and descriptions of financial positions; and, responds toinputs from the user to perform simulated transactions. A competitorprocess manages a unique financial position that changes to simulate theactions and responses of a hypothetical user competing against the user.

Simulating a business system that performs a market transaction mayinclude merely providing a user interface that accepts a buy/sell orderas discussed herein. In another implementation, additional userinterface controls and presentations are included in the simulation toadd realism or to improve the transfer of skills to a particularbusiness system. As discussed herein, significantly transferable skillsrelated to improved investing may be acquired by simulating merely theinput of the buy/sell order, the complete specification of the order(e.g., the number of shares, price per share, and date of transaction)being understood from the training software by the user at the time ofinput of the buy/sell order. In an alternate implementation, the usermay be required to enter any or all of a specification of a transaction.

A user process interacts with a conventional user interface (not shown)in any conventional manner. The user process and user interface may beperformed by (i.e., hosted on) the same engine or different engines maybe in communication in any conventional manner (e.g., shared memory,operating system calls, remote procedure calls, protocol stacks, messagehandlers, and/or via links and networks). As discussed below, processesmay be responsive to user input and provide presentations for userreview by interacting with peripherals (e.g., keyboards and monitors),interacting with a conventional user interface, or interacting withcommunication software.

For example, user process 300, of FIG. 3, includes pricing engine 301,opportunity engine 303, and financial position engine 305. These enginesmay be implemented on any combination of physical processors, circuits,and memory devices, on one or more servers and/or on one or more clientsas discussed above. A pricing engine determines a price for an item thatis the subject of a transaction on a market. A pricing engine maydetermine a forecast of prices for each of a multitude of items on eachof several markets. For example, pricing engine 301 includes sets offactors store 332, select set process 302, current set of factors store334, select current factor process 304, determine price process 306,price store 340, and report price history process 318.

Sets of factors store includes a set of factors for each of severalprice patterns. Six example price patterns are described in Table 1 andspecified for each market interval in Table 2. Each pattern has a uniquepattern length as illustrated in Table 2. Alternatively, sets of factorsmay be uniform in quantity of members of each set. Each set of factorsmay be scaled or subject to an offset, floor, or ceiling as desired tomore suitably simulate a price pattern of a particular type of itemand/or type of market.

TABLE 1 Patten Symbol Pattern Description K1 Symmetric triangle K2Rectangle K3 Ascending triangle K4 Bankruptcy K5 Cup K6 Head andshoulders

TABLE 2 Market Interval K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 1 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.90 1.101.10 2 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.90 1.10 1.10 3 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.90 1.10 1.09 41.10 1.10 1.10 0.90 1.00 1.07 5 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 0.95 1.07 6 1.100.90 0.90 1.10 0.95 0.94 7 0.90 0.90 0.90 1.10 0.95 0.94 8 0.90 0.900.90 0.85 0.95 0.97 9 0.90 1.10 1.10 0.85 0.97 1.07 10 0.90 1.10 1.100.85 1.00 1.07 11 0.90 1.10 1.10 0.70 1.00 1.07 12 1.10 0.90 0.90 1.001.03 1.10 13 1.10 0.90 0.90 1.10 1.04 0.93 14 1.10 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.050.93 15 0.90 1.10 1.10 0.07 1.05 0.93 16 0.90 1.10 0.90 0.06 1.04 0.9317 1.10 1.10 1.10 0.06 1.03 1.07 18 1.10 0.90 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.07 191.10 0.90 1.10 1.10 0.99 1.04 20 1.10 0.90 1.10 0.04 1.01 0.93 21 1.101.10 0.04 1.03 0.93 22 1.10 0.04 1.05 0.93 23 1.10 0.04 1.07 0.90 241.10 1.07 0.87 25 1.10 1.07 0.85 26 1.10 0.83 27 0.80 28 0.75

Select set process 302 selects a set of factors from sets of factorsstore 332 one for each item and market. Selection may be at random amongsets of factors 332. Selection may be accomplished initially (e.g., partof initialization of a session for a particular user); and may berepeated at any time to extend the current set of factors to anysuitable future extent. After the last specified factor of a firstpattern, the factor for the first market interval of the subsequentlyselected pattern is used. Select set process 302 selects a set,associates the selected set with an item of a market, and stores theassociations in current set of factors 334. The associations may bestored in any conventional manner (e.g., copy of set stored from 332 to334, adjusted copy of set 332 stored in 334, or pointer to set in 332stored in 334). Ring buffers (for repeating patterns) and linked listsmay be used.

For each market interval, a factor from each respective set isidentified for use in determining a price for the associated item. Forexample, select current factor process 304 keeps track of the currentmarket interval for each current set 334 for each item, and, on requestfrom determine price process 306 provides a suitable factor. In oneimplementation, store 334 comprises a pointer for each item accessibleby name of the item. On request for a current price for a named item,process 304 accesses store 334 to obtain a pointer value. Store 334 isindexed by name of item. Process 304 advances the pointer value by onemarket increment and then accesses store 332 using the incrementedpointer value. Store 332 is indexed by the pointer value to provide acurrent factor.

In one implementation, the current factor of the current set for an itemis applied to the price of the item in the immediately prior marketinterval (P_(n-1)) to determine a current price (P_(n)) for the item.That is, each next price in a forecast series of future prices isobtained by applying the corresponding factor for that future period tothe price in the immediately prior period. For example, determine priceprocess 306 determines a price for each item for each market for eachmarket interval and stores these prices in prices store 340. A marketinterval may be any suitable period of time. For instance, a timeinterval may be an actual time period such as several minutes in realtime that may correspond to scaled time for purposes of suitablesimulation (e.g., an hour, a day). When organized for competition asdiscussed below, each user and competitor process may act in turn andeach market interval may correspond to a turn. Each factor may be a usedas a mathematical factor that is applied by multiplying (e.g., thecurrent factor times P_(n-1) determines the current price PO. In analternative implementation factors are replaced by signed terms(positive or negative). Each current price P_(n), is determined byadding the corresponding term to P_(n-1). In another alternative, theterm is scaled by a factor associated with the item and/or the marketprior to use for addition.

Price store 340 includes prices for all items in all markets to assurethat any price needed for an opportunity or transaction may beefficiently obtained. Prices may be kept for any suitable period ofhistory prior to the current market interval.

Report price history process 318 responds to a conventional user input(not shown) to provide information for one or more tabular and/orgraphic presentations to the user of prices for any suitable periods oftime, items, and markets. Comparisons and contrasts may also be providedamong any combination of prices of suitable items and patterns.Comparisons may be accompanied by a figure of merit indicating closenessof fit (e.g., variance, sum of differences squared). By retaining priorprices, a user may learn how to base a buy/sell order on a pattern he orshe identifies in the history. At least four skills are taught: how torecognize a pattern, how to predict what the future of that pattern islikely to be, how to apply that prediction to a buy/sell order for apredefined opportunity, and how to fashion a user-defined transactionthat is likely to improve the user's financial position in light of thepredicted pattern.

An opportunity engine prepares an opportunity to participate in atransaction and provides information for a presentation of theopportunity to the user. Opportunity engine 303 includes opportunitiesstore 336, select opportunity process 310, current opportunity store338, and describe opportunity process 312.

An opportunities store provides storage for a plurality of opportunitiesregarding transactions for users and competitor processes involving anyitem or items from any market or markets. An opportunity may be fixed ordynamic. A fixed opportunity may be stored as a set of parameter values.A dynamic opportunity may include a stored algorithm (or reference to analgorithm) to be applied to current financial positions (342) and prices(340) to provide a dynamically defined opportunity. For example,opportunities store 336 provides fixed opportunities on request byselect opportunity process 310.

Each opportunity of store 336, for instance, is of a type described inTable 3. In Table 3, binary values are indicated T/F for true or false.Currency is indicated in dollars, though any currency may be used.Values in quotes are exemplary. An opportunity may include a recurringexpense (e.g., a loan payment) a recurring income (e.g., rent), and/oran expense (e.g., a tax, management fee, repairs) that may become dueaccording to a hypothetical event (e.g., after a predetermined time, atime triggered by other events, or a random time) to simulate annualtaxation or irregular repairs. An opportunity may be effect any of theparameters described below with reference to financial positions 342.

TABLE 3 Type of Opportunity Parameters and Example Values ExpenseMandatory T/F; Charitable T/F; Description = “Buy a yacht.”; Cost =“$30,000”; Down Payment = “$5,000”; Mortgage = “$25,000”; Cash Flow =“−$500”; Annual Expense = “$150”. Stock Symbol = “OK4U”; Market =“NYSE”; Number of shares = “500” (or from user); Price per share = (fromPrices 340); type of transaction = “short”; Dividends = “0”; Delay tillsettlement = “6 market intervals”; Projected ROI (Return on Investment).Real Estate Description = “Apartment Building”; Market = “Small Town”;Cost = “$300,000”; Down Payment = “$50,000”; Projected ROI; Mortgage =“$250,000”; Cash Flow = “+$4,500”. Loan Description = “Unsecured”; Cost= “$10,000”; Down Payment = “$0”; Cash on hand = “$10,000”; Cash Flow =“−$100”.

Select opportunity process 310 identifies an opportunity as the currentopportunity 338. Identification may be by copying the opportunity fromstore 336 to store 338; or by storing a pointer in store 338 for accessto the identified opportunity of store 336. Provision may be accordingto a random selection, according to a fixed series, or according to adynamic series based on financial positions 342 and prices 340.

Describe opportunity process 312 provides information about theopportunity for presentation to the user or a competitor process. In theopportunity, references to information to be supplied by the user (e.g.,desired number of shares) and references to current price (340) areadded to the provided information by process 312.

A financial position engine maintains a financial position of a user ora competitor process. Maintenance includes determining respectiveinitial values and updating values for each user and competitor process.Financial position engine 305 includes determine financial positionprocess 314, financial position store 342, and describe financialposition process 316.

A financial position includes parameters consistent with GAAP andoperation of the business system that performs market transactions. Forexample, a financial position may include information of a conventionalor simplified income statement and balance sheet. In one implementation,only those parameters stated in Table 4 are used so that training usingsystem 100 is relatively efficient.

TABLE 4 Group Parameter of a Financial Position Income statement -Income Salary; Interest; Dividends; Real estate cash flows; Businesscash flows; Passive income (all income except salary); Incomestatement - Expenses Taxes; Payments for mortgages and loans; Lumpedexpense related to raising children (e.g., the product of a fixedexpense and the number of children); Balance sheet - Assets Savings;Symbol, number of shares, and cost per share of stock, mutual fund, orcertificate of deposit; Real estate type, down payment, and total cost;Business type, down payment, and total cost; Balance sheet - LiabilitiesInitial principle amount of each mortgage and loan; Business liability;

Cash flow as used in different contexts herein means either an asset'scash flow or a user (or competitive process's) cash flow. An asset'scash flow means the net income or expense of holding an asset (e.g.,rental income or loss from real estate after maintenance and all otherexpenses). A user's cash flow means the sum of a user's (or competitiveprocess's) salary and all asset cash flows (positive and negative) minusthe sum of all expenses.

In response to a buy/sell order, the financial position of a user or acompetitor process is updated by determine financial position process314. Process 314 applies GAAP to update the respective financialposition of each user and competitor that may be affected by one or morebuy/sell orders involved in a single transaction. For example, when anasset is sold by one user (or competitor process) and purchased byanother user (or competitor process), both the buyer's and seller'srespective financial positions are updated. The buy/sell order maydirect buy, sell, or pass on current opportunity 338; direct selling thecurrent opportunity to another user (or competitive process); directputting the current opportunity 338 up for auction among users and/orcompetitive processes; may further include a specification of atransaction to complete (e.g., an ad hoc order to liquidate an asset,pay off a loan, participate in an auction, make an offer to another user(or competitive process); or direct a response to an offer from anotheruser (or competitive process).

Financial position store 342 may include a financial position for eachuser and each competitor process of the type described in Table 4.Accessed by determine financial position process 314 and describefinancial position process 316 may be by user name (or competitiveprocess name) and financial position parameter name.

Describe financial position process 316 provides information about thefinancial position of any user or competitor process for presentation toany particular user or to any competitor process.

Processes discussed above with reference to FIG. 3 may operate in amulti-threaded manner to support numerous sessions, each sessionpreserving a state for all users and competitive processes of therespective session. Although sets of factors 332 and opportunities 336may be common to all sessions, each session will typically have its ownunique instance of current set of factors store 334, current opportunitystore 338, prices store 340, and financial position store 342.

A competitor process performs automatically the operations of ahypothetical user having a selected level of skill. Each competitorprocess may have the same or a different level of skill relative to thehuman user(s) of the session and relative to other competitor processesof the session. A respective financial position is maintained for eachcompetitor process. Each competitor process makes independent decisionson opportunities and/or defined transactions. For example, competitorprocess 400 includes strategy engine 401 and evaluation engine 403.These engines may be implemented on any combination of physicalprocessors, circuits, and memory devices, on server(s) and/or client(s)as discussed above.

A strategy engine determines a strategy to be used by an instance of acompetitor process. In one implementation, the strategy is determinedonce at the beginning of the session that includes the respectivecompetitor process. Strategy engine 401 includes strategies store 432,select strategy process 402, and current strategy store 434. A strategymay be expressed as a set of parameter values as in Table 5. Forexample, strategies store 432 includes one set of parameter values foreach of two strategies described in Table 5. In other implementations,any number of different strategies may be included in store 434.

Process 402 selects and initializes a strategy and stores the result incurrent strategy store 434 for each instance of a competitor. Forexample, selection of either of two strategies of Table 5 may be made byrandom selection, or according to user input (not shown). As shown, thestrategy remains fixed for the duration of a session.

In Table 5, values specified as a range indicate that the value to bestored in the current strategy is selected (e.g., a random number)within the range by process 402. By selecting from within a range,different instances of competitor processes of the same strategy typehave slightly different behaviors that are consequently less predictableby a user. Also, operation of the competitor process may proceed in oneof two modes. In mode 1, the goal is to increase cash on hand. In mode2, the goal is to increase the total of asset cash flows and thecompetitor process's cash flow. The competitor process may use mode 1for a first range of financial positions and use mode 2 for a secondrange of financial positions. In other words, a competitor process mayreview its financial position to determine which of two modes is to beused. Review may occur at any suitable time, such as initially and aftereach update of the competitor process's financial position. Parametersthat incorporate stock symbols illustrate a way to implement parametersfor any stock symbol.

TABLE 5 Value for Value for Relatively Relatively Parameter Name andDescription Unskilled Skilled for Competitor Process (CP) CompetitorCompetitor AbsoluteMinCashFlow - Abstain from transactions that decreasethe  250-1200 250-750 CP's cash flow below this valueSalaryMinCashFlowPercent - Abstain from transactions that  10-100 15-25decrease the CP's cash flow below this percent of the CP's salaryDrawBigDealAmountGatheringCash - Participate in transactions10,000-15,000 50,000-80,000 that may cost more than $6,000 when in mode1 and cash on hand exceeds this valueDrawBigDealAmountGatheringCashFlow - Participate in  7,500-12,5005,000-8,000 transactions that cost more than $6,000 when in mode 2 andcash on hand exceeds this value DollarsNeededPerDollarCashFlow - Remainin or revert to mode 1 24-40 28-32 when the product of this value andthe difference between expenses and passive income is less than cash onhand UseMinRoi - If this value is more than 0.5, participate in 0-1 0transactions (regardless of mode 1 or 2) according to a test based onMinRoi (see MinRoi) MinRoi - If UseMinRoi is more than 0.5, participatein transactions 10-50 N/A when Projected ROI exceeds this valueDoStocks - If this value is 0, abstain from all stock transactions 0 1DoOptions - If this value is 0, abstain from all stock options 0 1transactions LookAhead - When estimating ROI prior to a stocktransaction, base −7 6 the ROI on the price as it was before (fornegative values) or it will be (for positive values) this number ofmarket intervals from current price. Note a user does not have theability to use this strategic concept when looking forward, but coulduse a similar strategy looking backward. DoShorts - If this value is 0,abstain from all stock short 0 1 transactions. MaxStockDollars - Maximumcost of an acceptable opportunity or 15,000 25,000 defined transactioninvolving stock MaxOptionDollars - Maximum cost of an acceptableopportunity or 5,000 25,000 defined transaction involving stock optionsAllowBankLoans - If this value is 0, do not borrow money to meet a 0 1down payment for a transaction. Otherwise, permit a loan if theresulting financial position does not violate AbsoluteMinCashFlow orSalaryMinCashFlowPercent, discussed above AlwaysPayBackBankLoans - Ifthis value is 1, define transactions to 1 0 retire bank loans, if theresulting financial position does not violate AbsoluteMinCashFlow orSalaryMinCashFlowPercent, discussed above AlwaysPayBackLoans - If thisvalue is 1, define transactions to 1 0 reduce expenses related to loansof any type, so long as the resulting financial position does notviolate AbsoluteMinCashFlow or SalaryMinCashFlowPercent, discussed abovePayBackLoansOnlyToGetOutOfRatRace - “Getting out of the rat 0-1 1 race”is synonymous with conventional retirement where there is no income fromsalary, and passive income exceeds expenses. If this value is greaterthan 0.5 and repayment of loans will reduce expenses sufficient toretire, then allow such a transaction to be defined.PayBackLoansOnlyInGatherCashFlowMode - If this value is more 0-1 0 than0.5, then abstain from defining transactions to pay back loans while inmode 1. ProbabilityToSellToAnotherPlayer - Before passing on an 0 0unacceptable opportunity, offer the opportunity for sale to another user(e.g., a user having the worst financial position) if a random numberbetween 0 and 1 exceeds this value SellMinAmount - Offer an opportunityto be sold to another user at  0-100 100 a price equal to the sum ofthis amount, the total cost of the opportunity (e.g., its asset value)times SellTotalCostFactorPercent, and the down payment of theopportunity times SellDownPayFactorPercent SellTotalCostFactorPercent -see SellMinAmount  50-150  75-150 SellDownPayFactorPercent - seeSellMinAmount  50-150  75-150 SellToAnyone - If this value is more than0.5, do not restrict the 1 0 offer discussed above with reference toProbabilityToSellToAnotherPlayer to only the user having the worstfinancial position. ProbabilityToAuction - Before passing on anunacceptable 0 0 opportunity, offer the opportunity for auction toanother user (e.g., a user having the worst financial position) if arandom number between 0 and 1 exceeds this value AuctionMinAmount -Offer an opportunity to be auctioned to  0-100 100 another user at aprice equal to the sum of this amount, the total cost of the opportunity(e.g., its asset value) times AuctionTotalCostFactorPercent, and thedown payment of the opportunity times AuctionDownPayFactorPercentAuctionTotalCostFactorPercent - see AuctionMinAmount  50-150  75-150AuctionDownPayFactorPercent - see AuctionMinAmount  50-150  75-150AuctionToAnyone - analogous to SellToAnyone 1 0 GambleOnIpos - Acceptopportunities to buy stock in Initial Public 1,000-1,000 100-300Offerings (IPOs) when the Projected ROI percent exceeds this percentagevalue DoDirectMarketing - Accept opportunities to buy into a direct 1 1marketing business BuyOK4U - If current price per share is less thanthis value, then N/A 20 accept opportunities to buy the stock whosesymbol is “OK4U” BuyMYT4U - If current price per share is less than thisvalue, then N/A 20 accept opportunities to buy the stock whose symbol is“MYT4U” BuyGRO4US - If current price per share is less than this value,then 10 N/A accept opportunities to buy the stock whose symbol is“GRO4US” SellOK4U - If current price per share exceeds this value, thenaccept N/A 30 opportunities to sell and define transactions to sell thestock whose symbol is “OK4U” SellMYT4U - If current price per shareexceeds this value, then N/A 30 accept opportunities to sell and definetransactions to sell the stock whose symbol is “MYT4U” SellGRO4US - Ifcurrent price per share exceeds this value, then 11 N/A acceptopportunities to sell and define transactions to sell the stock whosesymbol is “GRO4US” OnlySellIfAGain - If this value is more than 0.5,abstain from 1 0 participating in opportunities or defining transactionswhere the purchase price (or down payment) paid when acquiring the assetis greater than the proceeds from sale AlwaysSellIfAGain - If this valueis more than 0.5, participate in the 1 0 first available opportunity ordefined transaction for sale of the asset where the purchase price (ordown payment) paid when acquiring the asset is less than the proceedsfrom sale

Dynamic strategies may also be implemented, for example, with anadditional strategy updating process (not shown); or by repeatingselection by select strategy process 402. Updating or repeatingselection may occur after lapse of a suitable time or on occurrence oftriggering events (e.g., financial positions). Dynamic strategies maysimulate a competitor that tires with experience or gains skill withexperience.

To implement current strategy 434, an evaluation engine responds toopportunities and/or defines so called defined transactions. Forexample, evaluation engine 403 includes evaluate opportunity process 404and define transaction process 406. At any suitable time evaluationengine may provide a buy/sell order (analogous to buy/sell ordersdiscussed above) to update the financial position (314) of thecompetitor process. A suitable time may be on lapse of a suitableperiodic interval, or as a consequence of action by the user. Theparametric values that define an opportunity (338) as discussed aboveand the parametric values that define the current strategy (434) forthis competitor process are input to logic (404) that determines abuy/sell order. Such logic may access the financial position (342) ofthis competitor process and current prices from price store 340.Conventional do-case and if-then logic may be used. Any conventionalartificial intelligence decision making technology may be used (e.g., anexpert system). As discussed above, the buy/sell order may include buy,sell, auction this opportunity among the users, sell this opportunity toa user (e.g., the user with the current worst financial position), anddo nothing (e.g., pass).

A define transaction process 406 may create a favorable opportunity (onethat improves the competitor process's financial position) afterreviewing applicable records of current strategy store 434, financialposition store 342, and price store 340 (e.g., to sell items listed inthis competitor process's financial position). The financial position ofone or more users may be considered by process 406. A competitor processmay take an advantage over the user by considering forecasted pricerecords for items (e.g., buy at a relatively low price to sell at aforecasted relatively higher price). Forecasted prices are not availableto a user. Analogously, evaluate opportunity process 404 may accessfinancial position records of other users and forecasted prices fromprice store 340.

According to various aspects of the present invention, system 100 may beimplemented as a simulator of one or more of the business systemsdiscussed above with reference to FIG. 1. Operation of the simulatedconfirm control (17, 19, or 21) may provide a buy/sell order asdiscussed above. In another implementation, the functions of system 100may be integrated with any one or more of systems 12, 14, 16, 18, and20.

According to various aspects of the present invention, engine 301 may bereplaced with an engine that provides and updates prices 340 inaccordance with one or more real markets. In such an implementation,opportunities may be real or hypothetical. Suitable changes tostrategies 432 may be made to allow competitor processes to work withoutthe availability of real prices at future market intervals.

In another implementation, competitor processes use the financialposition of the user as a basis for providing suggested action onopportunities and suggested defined transactions. As such, competitorprocesses provide coaching to the user by example of consistentapplication of a strategy perhaps different from the user's strategy.

According to various aspects of the present invention, engine 305 mayfurther communicate with real accounts (e.g., as managed by system 14 asdiscussed above). Financial position information may include informationregarding real accounts. For example, when real and hypotheticalopportunities are both provided by engine 303, engine 305 may updatefinancial positions 342 that include both real and hypothetical amounts.

In yet another implementation, engine 401 records and analyzes userbuy/sell orders, opportunities, and financial positions to form andupdate a definition of a strategy apparently being employed by the user.A reporting process (not shown) may contrast the apparent user strategywith competitor process strategies of strategies 432 for additionaleducational feedback to the user.

According to various aspects of the present invention, system 100 andmethods discussed herein may be implemented as a game, the users beingplayers of the game taking turns at play. In one implementation, thegame includes an electronic game (e.g., including a user interface) ofthe type described in copending provisional patent application60/465,210 by R. Kiyosaki filed Apr. 24, 2003. Opportunities, financialstatements, game events, and game rules for system 100 as a game may beof the type described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,826,878, 6,106,300, and6,032,957 suitably adapted to markets and transactions described herein(e.g., options, auctions, futures, shorts, puts, calls). During eachplay, an opportunity may be presented (with a specified transaction) tothe player whose turn it is; and, any player may elect to initiate auser-defined transaction according to the particular user's currentfinancial position (or financial statements). Financial statements mayinclude a simplified income statement and balance sheet each suitablycorresponding to GAAP.

Each market as discussed above may include prices that change as a groupperiodically. The period may be any suitable period of time (e.g., 1minute) or may, for the game discussed above, be determined by gameevents. In one implementation, all market prices are adjusted at thebeginning of each turn taken by any player and remain unchanged untilthe end of that player's turn. Because each player may signal the end ofhis or her turn without regard to other players, turns may be of unequalduration. A player who desires to specify and conduct a user-definedtransaction may be prevented from doing so by another player who electsto signal the end of play for that turn before the desired user-definedtransaction is defined or completed. In another implementation, a turncontinues until all user-defined transactions have been provided for.

In a game hosted by server 102 on the Internet, players at clients 106may be in any country. The server in such an implementation may serveeach client in a multi-player game presenting a respective userinterface to each player in accordance with the language, currency, andmarkets suited to teaching the user. For example, an Italian speakingplayer may select to use a user interface in the Italian language todevelop skills trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) underUnited States laws and regulations using euros with appropriateconversions of currency. In a multi-player game, a competitor to theItalian speaking player may be an English speaking United Statescitizen. Comparison of financial positions by each user (e.g., forcompetition) is simplified by the server presenting to each user allother users' financial positions translated and in converted currenciesto simplify comparison.

The foregoing description discusses preferred embodiments of the presentinvention which may be changed or modified without departing from thescope of the present invention as defined in the claims. While for thesake of clarity of description, several specific embodiments of theinvention have been described, the scope of the invention is intended tobe measured by the claims as set forth below.

1. A system comprising: a processor; a user interface in communicationwith the processor; and a memory in communication with the processor andstoring instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause theprocessor to perform a method for simulating a business system thatconducts a market transaction, the method comprising: (a) determine aprice for an opportunity to participate in the market, whereindetermining the price comprises: (1) select a set of mathematicalfactors from a plurality of sets, wherein the set of factors isassociated with a predetermined price pattern; (2) select a currentfactor from the selected set; and (3) determine a price in accordancewith the current factor, wherein determining the price in accordancewith the current factor includes applying the current factor to animmediately prior market interval; (b) update a financial position of auser of the system in response to a transaction; and (c) perform thetransaction in accordance with the price and an input from the userthrough the user interface, the input from the user corresponding incontent to an input to the business system whereby the user developsskill in specifying market transactions to be conducted by reviewingchanges in the user's financial position.
 2. The system of claim 1,wherein the memory further stores instructions to cause the processor toupdate a financial position of an automated competitor that uses thebusiness system for a second transaction, wherein the automatedcompetitor determines whether to participate in the second transactionin accordance with a strategy selected from a set of stored strategies,and whereby the user develops skill in specifying market transactions tobe conducted by being aware of the second transaction and changes in theautomated competitor's financial position.
 3. The system of claim 2,wherein the selected strategy includes a set of parameters for defininghow the automated competitor responds to an opportunity to participatein the second transaction, and wherein at least one of the parameters isa numeric value randomly-selected from within a range of possiblevalues.
 4. The system of claim 2, further comprising replacing theselected strategy with a second strategy selected from the set of storedstrategies.
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the set of factors israndomly selected from the plurality of sets.
 6. The system of claim 1,further comprising performing multiple selections of factors from theplurality of sets.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein at least two of themultiple selections select the same set of factors from the plurality ofsets.